http://www.uk.sagepub.com/sageopen.spHow to submit your manuscript
Chronic Illness is hosted on Manuscript Central™, a web based online submission and peer review system - SAGETRACK. Please read the Manuscript Submission guidelines below, and then simply visit http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/chronicillness to login and submit your article online.
IMPORTANT: Please check whether you already have an account in the system before trying to create a new one. If you have reviewed or authored for the journal in the past year it is possible that you will have had an account created.
All papers must be submitted via the online system. If you would like to discuss your paper prior to submission, please refer to the contact details below.
Notes for Contributors - Chronic Illness
Articles submitted to Chronic Illness should comprise original, unpublished material and should not currently be under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Ethics committee approval should have been granted for all studies involving human participants and a statement to this effect should be included in the paper. The Editor reserves the right to seek a copy of the authorising letter from the relevant ethics committee.
The Editor reserves the right to make editorial and literary corrections. Any opinions expressed or policies advocated do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of the Editor.
REVIEWING AND EDITORIAL PROCESS
All original submissions, including those commissioned by the editorial team, will be initially assessed by the Editor or one of the Co-editors.
Contributions considered relevant to the aims and scope of the journal and likely to be of adequate quality will be sent out for external review. The journal's policy is to obtain at least two independent reviews of each article. The peer review process will be double-blind, i.e. neither reviewers nor authors will be informed of the identity of each other. Referees will be encouraged to provide substantive, constructive reviews that provide suggestions for improving the work and distinguish between mandatory and non-mandatory recommendations.
The Editor, in consultation with the Co-editors, will then make a decision about publication in the journal. He will inform the contributors in writing of his decision, and the reasoning behind it, and will provide contributors with anonymised copies of the external reviews.
All manuscripts accepted for publication are subject to editing for presentation, style and grammar. Any major redrafting is agreed with the author but the Editor's decision on the text is final.
PRESENTATION OF SUBMISSIONS
These instructions are in accordance with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals (the 'Vancouver' system).BMJ 1991;302 (6772). See also: http:/www.icmje.org/index.html
Word length
Review papers, discussion papers, and papers including substantive qualitative research should be no more than 5000 words in length, excluding structured abstracts, quantitative tables and figures, and references.
Quantitative research papers should be no more than 3000 words in length, excluding structured abstracts, tables and figures, and references.
Short reports, commentaries on classic papers and patients' comments should be no more than 1000 words in length, including abstracts, tables and figures, and references.
Authors wishing to submit lengthier papers should first discuss their work with the Editor.
Review papers
We welcome systematic reviews and syntheses on areas of interest and importance to those concerned with chronic illness. A clear research question and a description of methods, including search strategies and quality appraisal, should be provided. Methods for synthesis, including meta-analysis, narrative summary, meta-ethnography etc., should be clearly explained.
Discussion papers
These will normally be commissioned, but the Editor will be pleased to receive recommendations for new topics. Discussion papers need to be a statement of a new idea or controversial matter where the opinion being expressed is at least partly based on published evidence. Unlike reviews, there is no obligation for authors of discussion papers to be impartial in citing the available literature.
Short reports
These are a useful method for reporting circumscribed research where the study or the results may not justify a full report. It does not imply a lower standard for the quality of the work reported. The guidance is the same as for original articles with the following exceptions:
The summary need not be a structured abstract.
Authors should limit themselves to no more than ten references and two figures or tables.
Patient comments
We welcome submissions of articles, including comments on published papers, from people who experience chronic illness or their carers.
Commentaries on classic papers
These will normally be commissioned, but the Editor will also be pleased to consider unsolicited copy.
FULL PAPERS
Papers should be set out as follows, with each section beginning on a separate sheet: title page, abstract, text, acknowledgements, references, tables, captions to illustrations.
Title page.The title page should give the following information: (1) title of the article; (2) first name(s) or initial(s) and surname of each author; (3) address of the department or institution to which the work should be attributed; (4) full postal address of each author; (5) name, telephone, email address and fax number of the author responsible for correspondence and to whom requests for offprints should be sent. (This is particularly important where the corresponding author is not the first named author.)
Abstract.This should consist of not more than 200 words summarising the contents of the article.It is important, especially for indexing services, that this must be intelligible independently of the article. It should be presumed that the reader has some knowledge of the subject but has not read the paper.
Structured abstracts are essential for research and review papers, and should be submitted under the headings: objectives, methods, results, and discussion.
Keywords. Authors are asked to supply up to five keywords (in alphabetical order) to be used as an aid to indexing.
Acknowledgements.Sources of support, for example in the form of grants, should be included where relevant.
References.The accuracy of references is the responsibility of the author. References should be entered consecutively by Arabic numerals as superscripts following the punctuation mark (e.g. . . tested.27 The. . . ). The reference list should be listed in numerical order on a separate sheet in single spacing. Reference to journals should include the author's name and initials (list all authors when six or fewer; when seven or more, list only the first three and add et al.), full title of paper, journal title abbreviated (using Index Medicus abbreviations), year of publication, volume number, first and last page numbers.For example:
Rosengren A, Wilhelmsen L, Orth-Gomer K. Coronary disease in relation to social support and social class in Swedish men. A 15-year follow-up in the study of men born in 1933. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 56-63
References to books should be set out as follows:
Appleby J, Harrison A, Devlin N. What is the real cost of patient choice? London: King's Fund, 2003
Tables.Use only one tab (not spaces) to separate each column in a table. Do not submit tables as photographs. Care should be taken to ensure that all units are included. A short descriptive title should appear above each table and any footnotes, suitably identified, should appear below. Ensure that each table is cited in the text.
Advice on submitting original research papers
The introduction should provide an appropriate background to the article, drawing on relevant literature and explaining the research question to be addressed. Authors should avoid obviously partisan selection and quotation of literature.
The methods section should demonstrate a clear and documented design or strategy directed towards a specific research question. The study design should be appropriate to the aims of the study and be clearly described. The criteria for selecting the sample should be clearly described and justified. A clear description of sampling, recruitment to the study, data collection, and data analysis should be provided. Full details of interventions should be given for intervention studies. This section should also include details of approval from a named Research Ethics Committee, and any arrangements for data oversight.
Authors submitting randomised controlled trials (RCTs) should follow the revised CONSORT guidelines, including a completed CONSORT checklist and flowchart of participants in the trial. Guidance can be found at http:/jama.ama-assn.org/gintent/full/291/1/125/DC4 or JAMA 2003; 291:125.
The results section should contain all the information required by referees and readers to assess the validity of the conclusions. The characteristics of the sample included in the study should be clearly described. For quantitative studies, the section should include details of the response rates and numbers lost to follow-up. The analysis should be clear and systematic. Results of statistical tests should be reported with confidence intervals in order to provide an estimate of precision. No more than six tables should be included.
Please include a structured discussion. We recommend that this covers the following sections, using sub-headings:
summary of main findings;
the strengths and the limitations of this study;
how and why it agrees or disagrees with the existing literature, in particular including any papers published since the study was designed and carried out;
the implications for future research or clinical practice.
We will normally expect no more than 25 references for an original research paper.
Additional advice on qualitative research papers
Please consider the following additional guidelines for submitting qualitative research papers to Chronic Illness:
Choice of methods. Ensure that the study design and method of analysis are suited to, and sufficient, to address the research question being asked.
Sampling. Please explain clearly the rationale for sampling, and how the adequacy of the sample was assessed.
Method of analysis. A recognised, referenced methodology should be specified for the data analysis. It is not sufficient to use terms such as 'thematic analysis' or 'grounded theory' without identifying precisely which version of these methods is being used. There must be a clear account of how the analysis was conducted, which should show that the main principles and procedures of the methodology specified have been followed.
Quotations or other data extracts. Support your analysis with sufficient data extracts. Quotations should usually be quoted within the main text, and should be labelled to indicate their source, and to demonstrate the range of sources being used to illustrate the analysis. Care should be taken not to breach the confidentiality of participants either in the labelling of data extractions or through the data extract itself.
Reporting. There should be clear links between the data, the interpretation, and the conclusions.
ILLUSTRATIONS
Please note that it is the responsibility of authors to produce and supply artwork at their own cost. Please supply illustrations as TIFF or JPEG files.
Line illustrations.All line illustrations should present a crisp black image on an even white background127x173 mm, or no larger than 203x254 mm. Figures should be submitted appropriately lettered in capitals. The size of letters should be appropriate to that of the illustration. It is important to take into account the necessary size reduction. Be certain that the symbols utilized will be distinguished after reduction. If illustrations are computer generated, please avoid the use of grey tints. Solid black, solid white, or hatched areas are acceptable.
Photographic illustrations and radiographs.These should be submitted as clear, highly contrasted black and white images, sizes as above. Photomicrographs should have the magnification and details of staining techniques shown. X-ray film should be submitted and carefully made to bring out the detail to be illustrated, with an overlay indicating the area of importance.
Illustrations in colour will only be accepted if the cost of origination and publication is paid for by the author. Captions should be typed, double spaced, separate from the main text.
Patient confidentiality. Where illustrations must include recognisable individuals, living or dead and of whatever age, care must be taken to ensure that consent for publication has been given.
Permission for reproduction of previously published material. Written permission to reproduce borrowed material must be obtained from the original publishers and authors, and submitted with the typescript. Borrowed material should be acknowledged in the captions in this style: 'Reproduced by the kind permission of . . . (publishers) from . . . (reference).'
ABBREVIATIONS AND UNITS
All measurements should be expressed in metric units. For more detailed recommendations, authors may consult the Royal Society of Medicine publication entitledUnits, Symbols and Abbreviations: A Guide for Biological and Medical Editors and Authors or USA equivalent.
PROPRIETARY NAMES
Proprietary names of drugs, instruments etc. should be indicated by the use of initial capital letters.
AUTHORSHIP
The list of authors should include all those who can legitimately claim authorship. This will be all those who have made a substantial contribution to the concept and design, conduct, analysis or writing up a study. Authors may if they wish supply details of their individual contributions to the work, but we do not insist on it, and the data will not be published. Contributions would be expected to fall into one of the following categories, though one of these may not be sufficient on its own to warrant authorship
Conceiving and designing the study
Obtaining funding and/or ethical approval
Collecting the data
Analysing the data
Interpreting the data
Writing the report in part or wholly
Revising the report
Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content relevant to their own contribution. We do not require all authors to sign the initial letter accompanying submission; however, all authors must sig
