Evaluating America’s Teachers
Purchase
Description
When teacher evaluations are fair, everyone wins.
Poor evaluation systems don’t just hurt teachers—they hurt students, too. That’s why America can’t afford to wait for the teacher-evaluation problem to be solved. To provide balanced, accurate, and rigorous evaluations that take into account each teacher’s particular circumstances, only one system can work: evidence-governed collegial judgment.
As states and schools scramble to find workable responses to accountability mandates, well-informed educators can make key contributions. Start here with
- A discussion of common evaluation systems, including testing, value-added models, and observations
- Analysis of federal guidelines and state responses
- Action steps teachers and school leaders can take to influence policy
- A clear rationale and strategies for implementing a teacher evaluation model based on human judgment
Evaluating America’s Teachers demonstrates that the vision is possible: effective teacher evaluations that benefit schools as a whole.
“Teachers, administrators, and policy makers rejoice! Here is a single book, from a nationally recognized scholar, that makes sense of the issues involved with the evaluation of teachers.”
—David C. Berliner, Regents’ Professor Emeritus
Arizona State University
“Once again Jim Popham has brought insight and clarity to a complex topic that only a person of his stature and expertise could provide.”
—Robert J. Marzano, CEO
Marzano Research Laboratory
“In an effective and diplomatic manner, Jim suggests concrete ways policymakers, along with local school leaders and teachers, can make sure our students are protected from summative teacher-evaluation systems that do more harm than good. No one should make policy at any level or strive to build a defensible teacher evaluation system without studying this book.”
—Rick Stiggins, Retired Executive Director
Assessment Training Institute
Contents
Preface
Preface
Acknowledgments
- 1. What Underlies the Tightening of Today's Teacher-Evaluation Programs?
- What Uncle Sam Wants
- A Federal Vision of Teacher Evaluation
- What Could Go Wrong?
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 2. Human Judgment: Needed or Not?
- Human Judgment's Role
- Evaluation Basics
- What about the Evaluation of Teachers?
- Judgment-Requisite Choices
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 3. Defensible Teacher Evaluation
- The Wonders of Whereas
- Why Use a Weighted-Evidence Judgmental Approach to Teacher Evaluation?
- A Weighted-Evidence Judgment Evaluative Survey
- Who Are the Judges?
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 4. Evidence from Standardized Tests
- Key Testing Tenets
- Why We Test
- A Psychometric Blessed Trinity
- Standardized Test- Two Tribes, Two Tasks
- Traditional Test-Building and Its Off-Task Allure
- The Origins of Traditional Educational Testing
- Dealing with Effective Instruction
- Ensuring Score-Spread from the Get-Go
- Instructional Sensitivity as a Requisite
- Returning to Validity
- Evidential-Weight Guidelines
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 5. Evidence from Classroom Assessments
- Staking Out the Nature of "Classroom Assessment"
- A Quest for Evidence of Student Growth
- Formative and Summative Applications
- Enhancing the Quality of Classroom-Assessment Evidence
- Evidence of a Teacher's Instructional Ability
- What's Assessed
- The Traditional Psychometric Triplets
- Following Test Development, Improvement, and Scoring Rules
- Have Teachers Played it Straight?
- Evidential-Weight Guidelines
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 6. Evidence from Classroom Observations
- What's Distinctive about Classroom Observations?
- Observations Versus Ratings
- Playing the Odds: Observation of Instructional Means
- An Observational Reality: The Mysterious Middle Group
- Getting the Most Evaluative Mileage Out of Classroom Observation Evidence
- Two Widely-Used Observation Procedures
- Danielson's Framework for Teaching
- The Marzano Model
- Evidential-Weight Guidelines
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 7. Evidence from Ratings
- Rooting Around with Ratings
- Lurking Comparisons
- Amalgam Judgments
- Three Flavors of Bias
- Administrators' Ratings
- Students' Ratings
- Making Ratings Righteous
- The Rating Form
- Rater Preparation
- The Old and the New
- Evidential-Weight Guidelines
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 8. Evidence from Sundry Sources
- Alternative Sources of Evidence for Evaluating Teachers
- Academic Achievements
- Changes in Students' Affect
- Lesson Plans
- Opportunity-to-Learn Student Surveys
- Parental Engagement
- Parent Ratings
- Professional Development
- Ratings by Colleagues
- Student Interviews
- Teacher-Made Tests
- Teachers' Self-Ratings
- Augmentation or Obfuscation?
- Evidential-Weight Guidelines
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 9. Mission Possible?
- Weighted-Evidence Judgment of Teachers: A Reprise
- What To Do- And How?
- Chapter Imlpications for Three Audiences
- Responding to a Subtitle
Index
Index
Additional materials
Description
When teacher evaluations are fair, everyone wins.
Poor evaluation systems don’t just hurt teachers—they hurt students, too. That’s why America can’t afford to wait for the teacher-evaluation problem to be solved. To provide balanced, accurate, and rigorous evaluations that take into account each teacher’s particular circumstances, only one system can work: evidence-governed collegial judgment.
As states and schools scramble to find workable responses to accountability mandates, well-informed educators can make key contributions. Start here with
- A discussion of common evaluation systems, including testing, value-added models, and observations
- Analysis of federal guidelines and state responses
- Action steps teachers and school leaders can take to influence policy
- A clear rationale and strategies for implementing a teacher evaluation model based on human judgment
Evaluating America’s Teachers demonstrates that the vision is possible: effective teacher evaluations that benefit schools as a whole.
“Teachers, administrators, and policy makers rejoice! Here is a single book, from a nationally recognized scholar, that makes sense of the issues involved with the evaluation of teachers.”
—David C. Berliner, Regents’ Professor Emeritus
Arizona State University
“Once again Jim Popham has brought insight and clarity to a complex topic that only a person of his stature and expertise could provide.”
—Robert J. Marzano, CEO
Marzano Research Laboratory
“In an effective and diplomatic manner, Jim suggests concrete ways policymakers, along with local school leaders and teachers, can make sure our students are protected from summative teacher-evaluation systems that do more harm than good. No one should make policy at any level or strive to build a defensible teacher evaluation system without studying this book.”
—Rick Stiggins, Retired Executive Director
Assessment Training Institute
Contents
Preface
Preface
Acknowledgments
- 1. What Underlies the Tightening of Today's Teacher-Evaluation Programs?
- What Uncle Sam Wants
- A Federal Vision of Teacher Evaluation
- What Could Go Wrong?
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 2. Human Judgment: Needed or Not?
- Human Judgment's Role
- Evaluation Basics
- What about the Evaluation of Teachers?
- Judgment-Requisite Choices
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 3. Defensible Teacher Evaluation
- The Wonders of Whereas
- Why Use a Weighted-Evidence Judgmental Approach to Teacher Evaluation?
- A Weighted-Evidence Judgment Evaluative Survey
- Who Are the Judges?
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 4. Evidence from Standardized Tests
- Key Testing Tenets
- Why We Test
- A Psychometric Blessed Trinity
- Standardized Test- Two Tribes, Two Tasks
- Traditional Test-Building and Its Off-Task Allure
- The Origins of Traditional Educational Testing
- Dealing with Effective Instruction
- Ensuring Score-Spread from the Get-Go
- Instructional Sensitivity as a Requisite
- Returning to Validity
- Evidential-Weight Guidelines
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 5. Evidence from Classroom Assessments
- Staking Out the Nature of "Classroom Assessment"
- A Quest for Evidence of Student Growth
- Formative and Summative Applications
- Enhancing the Quality of Classroom-Assessment Evidence
- Evidence of a Teacher's Instructional Ability
- What's Assessed
- The Traditional Psychometric Triplets
- Following Test Development, Improvement, and Scoring Rules
- Have Teachers Played it Straight?
- Evidential-Weight Guidelines
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 6. Evidence from Classroom Observations
- What's Distinctive about Classroom Observations?
- Observations Versus Ratings
- Playing the Odds: Observation of Instructional Means
- An Observational Reality: The Mysterious Middle Group
- Getting the Most Evaluative Mileage Out of Classroom Observation Evidence
- Two Widely-Used Observation Procedures
- Danielson's Framework for Teaching
- The Marzano Model
- Evidential-Weight Guidelines
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 7. Evidence from Ratings
- Rooting Around with Ratings
- Lurking Comparisons
- Amalgam Judgments
- Three Flavors of Bias
- Administrators' Ratings
- Students' Ratings
- Making Ratings Righteous
- The Rating Form
- Rater Preparation
- The Old and the New
- Evidential-Weight Guidelines
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 8. Evidence from Sundry Sources
- Alternative Sources of Evidence for Evaluating Teachers
- Academic Achievements
- Changes in Students' Affect
- Lesson Plans
- Opportunity-to-Learn Student Surveys
- Parental Engagement
- Parent Ratings
- Professional Development
- Ratings by Colleagues
- Student Interviews
- Teacher-Made Tests
- Teachers' Self-Ratings
- Augmentation or Obfuscation?
- Evidential-Weight Guidelines
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 9. Mission Possible?
- Weighted-Evidence Judgment of Teachers: A Reprise
- What To Do- And How?
- Chapter Imlpications for Three Audiences
- Responding to a Subtitle
Index
Index
Additional materials
Reviews
April 2013 | 200 pages | Corwin
| Format | Published Date | ISBN | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paperback | 01/02/2026 | 9781452260853 | $37.95 |
When teacher evaluations are fair, everyone wins.
Poor evaluation systems don’t just hurt teachers—they hurt students, too. That’s why America can’t afford to wait for the teacher-evaluation problem to be solved. To provide balanced, accurate, and rigorous evaluations that take into account each teacher’s particular circumstances, only one system can work: evidence-governed collegial judgment.
As states and schools scramble to find workable responses to accountability mandates, well-informed educators can make key contributions. Start here with
- A discussion of common evaluation systems, including testing, value-added models, and observations
- Analysis of federal guidelines and state responses
- Action steps teachers and school leaders can take to influence policy
- A clear rationale and strategies for implementing a teacher evaluation model based on human judgment
Evaluating America’s Teachers demonstrates that the vision is possible: effective teacher evaluations that benefit schools as a whole.
“Teachers, administrators, and policy makers rejoice! Here is a single book, from a nationally recognized scholar, that makes sense of the issues involved with the evaluation of teachers.”
—David C. Berliner, Regents’ Professor Emeritus
Arizona State University
“Once again Jim Popham has brought insight and clarity to a complex topic that only a person of his stature and expertise could provide.”
—Robert J. Marzano, CEO
Marzano Research Laboratory
“In an effective and diplomatic manner, Jim suggests concrete ways policymakers, along with local school leaders and teachers, can make sure our students are protected from summative teacher-evaluation systems that do more harm than good. No one should make policy at any level or strive to build a defensible teacher evaluation system without studying this book.”
—Rick Stiggins, Retired Executive Director
Assessment Training Institute
Table Of Contents:
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1. What Underlies the Tightening of Today's Teacher-Evaluation Programs?
- What Uncle Sam Wants
- A Federal Vision of Teacher Evaluation
- What Could Go Wrong?
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 2. Human Judgment: Needed or Not?
- Human Judgment's Role
- Evaluation Basics
- What about the Evaluation of Teachers?
- Judgment-Requisite Choices
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 3. Defensible Teacher Evaluation
- The Wonders of Whereas
- Why Use a Weighted-Evidence Judgmental Approach to Teacher Evaluation?
- A Weighted-Evidence Judgment Evaluative Survey
- Who Are the Judges?
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 4. Evidence from Standardized Tests
- Key Testing Tenets
- Why We Test
- A Psychometric Blessed Trinity
- Standardized Test- Two Tribes, Two Tasks
- Traditional Test-Building and Its Off-Task Allure
- The Origins of Traditional Educational Testing
- Dealing with Effective Instruction
- Ensuring Score-Spread from the Get-Go
- Instructional Sensitivity as a Requisite
- Returning to Validity
- Evidential-Weight Guidelines
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 5. Evidence from Classroom Assessments
- Staking Out the Nature of "Classroom Assessment"
- A Quest for Evidence of Student Growth
- Formative and Summative Applications
- Enhancing the Quality of Classroom-Assessment Evidence
- Evidence of a Teacher's Instructional Ability
- What's Assessed
- The Traditional Psychometric Triplets
- Following Test Development, Improvement, and Scoring Rules
- Have Teachers Played it Straight?
- Evidential-Weight Guidelines
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 6. Evidence from Classroom Observations
- What's Distinctive about Classroom Observations?
- Observations Versus Ratings
- Playing the Odds: Observation of Instructional Means
- An Observational Reality: The Mysterious Middle Group
- Getting the Most Evaluative Mileage Out of Classroom Observation Evidence
- Two Widely-Used Observation Procedures
- Danielson's Framework for Teaching
- The Marzano Model
- Evidential-Weight Guidelines
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 7. Evidence from Ratings
- Rooting Around with Ratings
- Lurking Comparisons
- Amalgam Judgments
- Three Flavors of Bias
- Administrators' Ratings
- Students' Ratings
- Making Ratings Righteous
- The Rating Form
- Rater Preparation
- The Old and the New
- Evidential-Weight Guidelines
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 8. Evidence from Sundry Sources
- Alternative Sources of Evidence for Evaluating Teachers
- Academic Achievements
- Changes in Students' Affect
- Lesson Plans
- Opportunity-to-Learn Student Surveys
- Parental Engagement
- Parent Ratings
- Professional Development
- Ratings by Colleagues
- Student Interviews
- Teacher-Made Tests
- Teachers' Self-Ratings
- Augmentation or Obfuscation?
- Evidential-Weight Guidelines
- Chapter Implications for Three Audiences
- 9. Mission Possible?
- Weighted-Evidence Judgment of Teachers: A Reprise
- What To Do- And How?
- Chapter Imlpications for Three Audiences
- Responding to a Subtitle
- Index