Exaggerated Claims?

The ESRC, 50 Years On
First Edition
Exaggerated Claims?
November 2015 | 128 pages | Sage UK
Create Flyer

Purchase

Hardcover
ISBN: 9781473942233
Available from January 0001

Description

"David Walker’s analysis is incisive and hard hitting. Anyone who believes in the power of social science to inform better policy making should take his criticisms seriously."
- Sue Duncan, Former Chief Government Social Researcher and Head of the Government Social Research Service

"David Walker has written an unofficial summary of ESRC's achievements and struggles. He brings to the task long experience of the organisation and of the key players, a great familiarity with the literature and a sceptical nature. The result is stimulating, instructive, contentious and sometimes even infuriating."
- David Rhind, Chair of the Nuffield Foundation

What is the role of the state in distributing research money? How do 'arm's-length' funding agencies relate to public policy and business? This original study looks at the main social science funding agency in the UK, which was established 50 years ago. It examines how funding decisions are related to power. The 'critical' and ‘policy' aspects of successful research bids are discussed. Walker asks the tricky question, why has social science research not achieved a more salient role in state policy formation and management strategy: is the funding agency responsible? 

Insightful, engrossing and highly original, the book will be required reading for anyone who has written or will write a Social Science research bid and, more widely, for students of power, knowledge and culture.

Contents

Chapter 1: Introduction

Chapter 1: Introduction

Chapter 2: The ESRC Today

Chapter 2: The ESRC Today

Chapter 3: Promise and disappointment

Chapter 3: Promise and disappointment

Chapter 4: Reprieve and normalisation

Chapter 4: Reprieve and normalisation

Chapter 5: An agent of amerlioration

Chapter 5: An agent of amerlioration

Chapter 6: Academic capture

Chapter 6: Academic capture

Chapter 7: Cumulative knowledge?

Chapter 7: Cumulative knowledge?

Chapter 8: Conclusion

Chapter 8: Conclusion

Additional materials

Description

"David Walker’s analysis is incisive and hard hitting. Anyone who believes in the power of social science to inform better policy making should take his criticisms seriously."
- Sue Duncan, Former Chief Government Social Researcher and Head of the Government Social Research Service

"David Walker has written an unofficial summary of ESRC's achievements and struggles. He brings to the task long experience of the organisation and of the key players, a great familiarity with the literature and a sceptical nature. The result is stimulating, instructive, contentious and sometimes even infuriating."
- David Rhind, Chair of the Nuffield Foundation

What is the role of the state in distributing research money? How do 'arm's-length' funding agencies relate to public policy and business? This original study looks at the main social science funding agency in the UK, which was established 50 years ago. It examines how funding decisions are related to power. The 'critical' and ‘policy' aspects of successful research bids are discussed. Walker asks the tricky question, why has social science research not achieved a more salient role in state policy formation and management strategy: is the funding agency responsible? 

Insightful, engrossing and highly original, the book will be required reading for anyone who has written or will write a Social Science research bid and, more widely, for students of power, knowledge and culture.

Contents

Chapter 1: Introduction

Chapter 1: Introduction

Chapter 2: The ESRC Today

Chapter 2: The ESRC Today

Chapter 3: Promise and disappointment

Chapter 3: Promise and disappointment

Chapter 4: Reprieve and normalisation

Chapter 4: Reprieve and normalisation

Chapter 5: An agent of amerlioration

Chapter 5: An agent of amerlioration

Chapter 6: Academic capture

Chapter 6: Academic capture

Chapter 7: Cumulative knowledge?

Chapter 7: Cumulative knowledge?

Chapter 8: Conclusion

Chapter 8: Conclusion

Additional materials

SAGE Publishing Logo

Exaggerated Claims?

The ESRC, 50 Years On


November 2015 | 128 pages | Sage UK

Format Published Date ISBN Price
Hardcover 31/03/2026 9781473942233 $94.00

"David Walker’s analysis is incisive and hard hitting. Anyone who believes in the power of social science to inform better policy making should take his criticisms seriously."
- Sue Duncan, Former Chief Government Social Researcher and Head of the Government Social Research Service

"David Walker has written an unofficial summary of ESRC's achievements and struggles. He brings to the task long experience of the organisation and of the key players, a great familiarity with the literature and a sceptical nature. The result is stimulating, instructive, contentious and sometimes even infuriating."
- David Rhind, Chair of the Nuffield Foundation

What is the role of the state in distributing research money? How do 'arm's-length' funding agencies relate to public policy and business? This original study looks at the main social science funding agency in the UK, which was established 50 years ago. It examines how funding decisions are related to power. The 'critical' and ‘policy' aspects of successful research bids are discussed. Walker asks the tricky question, why has social science research not achieved a more salient role in state policy formation and management strategy: is the funding agency responsible? 

Insightful, engrossing and highly original, the book will be required reading for anyone who has written or will write a Social Science research bid and, more widely, for students of power, knowledge and culture.

Table Of Contents:

  • Chapter 1: Introduction
  • Chapter 2: The ESRC Today
  • Chapter 3: Promise and disappointment
  • Chapter 4: Reprieve and normalisation
  • Chapter 5: An agent of amerlioration
  • Chapter 6: Academic capture
  • Chapter 7: Cumulative knowledge?
  • Chapter 8: Conclusion

Recent Product Reviews:

More a critique than celebration... 50 years of ambiguity, missed opportunities and muddling through. Walker captures the enduring tensions that have characterised ESRC - and UK social science more broadly. A ‘must read’ for all social scientists, especially those who want to influence the next 50 years.
Jonathan Grant, King's College London
David Walker offers a characteristically sharp-minded - and sharp-worded - verdict on the first half century of the UK's research council for the social sciences, once the SSRC now the Economic and Social Research Council. If he privileges policy research over other forms, and focuses on relationships with Whitehall (and the 'public') over those with universities (and social scientists themselves), that does not diminish the power of his critique. If the vigour of his analysis and ability to stimulate controversy may tend in the eyes of some to undermine his own thesis that the social sciences have been marginalised, others will see these same characteristics as proof of the social sciences’ enduring creativity – and challenge.
Peter Scott, University College London
David Walker’s analysis is incisive and hard hitting. Anyone who believes in the power of social science to inform better policy making should take his criticisms seriously.
Sue Duncan, Former Chief Government Social Researcher and Head of the Government Social Research Service
David Walker has written an unofficial summary of ESRC's achievements and struggles. He brings to the task long experience of the organisation and of the key players, a great familiarity with the literature and a sceptical nature. The result is stimulating, instructive, contentious and sometimes even infuriating.
David Rhind, Chair of the Nuffield Foundation
This book looks at the role of the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and its relationship with academics, non-university researchers, policy-makers and government... This erudite, eminently quotable and thoroughly iconoclastic book tells the story of opportunities lost; it is not an account of unequivocal failure. It is also about much more than the ESRC, as Walker has issued a clarion call to all those who believe in interdisciplinary working.
Paul Webb, Significance

Recommendations